Two people sharing a home: one threw out some leftover supplement pills thinking they were spare, but they turned out to be ones the other saved only for rough days. It started from a misunderstanding, but they were tossed without asking, and with things being thrown out this easily before too, resentment had built up.
A · Who tossed the pillsWe both take vitamins daily, so I threw out the leftover iodine pills thinking they were spare. My partner got really upset. If I'd known they weren't a daily thing, I'd have kept them.
B · The pills' ownerI only take those on rough days, so they were mine, and they got tossed without a word. Honestly it's not just this; my stuff gets thrown out too easily.
A B
Verdicts are generated in Korean and translated, but the ratio and judgment stay the same.
Logic · The core is the responsibility for the action (throwing out someone else's thing without asking), so the logical weight sits a bit more with A. Good faith mitigates intent only.
Emotion · The real trigger wasn't one pill. It was the built-up hurt inside B that "my things get thrown out without asking."
Ever both asked GPT after a fight?
Two answers, each taking a side, and nothing got settled.
How it works
1Each writesBoth sides write their side, privately.
2One AI judgesA single AI weighs both, once.
3Same result · a cardYou both see the same result, with a reconciliation card.
We don't pick sides from one story
Usually you only see the writer's side, so opinions split from the start. StopFight has both sides write their own story, then an AI weighs them together before judging, balanced from the very first input.
Usual communityOne-sided post → one-sided take
StopFightBoth sides in → neutral write-up → judgment